data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d11/f5d119f826bdbc99965ead5a71d5432c3946e8fa" alt="Harrison mixbus 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74db2/74db215f931e6218d009f473ef3bce9755676514" alt="harrison mixbus 2 harrison mixbus 2"
As far as busses go, it’s impossible.Īnother lousy characteristic of their busses: Unless you’re willing to spend big bucks on the high-end version of Mixbus (Mixbus32C), you’re limited to 8 busses total. To me, things like this completely stifle creativity for changes you’d like and/or need to make well into the mixing process. No matter what anyone says, it’s a computer program and therefore DIGITAL! Just what the hell is “Analog Workflow” anyway? Not that it matters, because this thing is a DAW (DIGITAL AUDIO WORKSTATION). Their claim there is being able to move mixer busses would interfere with the “Analog Workflow” which is what Mixbus seems to pride itself on, that being the emulation of their famous analog hardware mixing consoles. The catch? If you do, you wind up with a situation where the order of your mixer bus strips no longer matches the order of their corresponding lanes in the editor. You can’t reorder or move busses in any way in the mixer, yet you can in the editor. Once you set up your main busses, you’d better be happy with them from there on out in your project.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a648/3a6483c354beea4c4844b2bea2b658c6998671b2" alt="harrison mixbus 2 harrison mixbus 2"
– Bus functionality (or rather, the lack thereof): That’s obviously a very bad thing, but it’s far from all that makes it inferior to any other DAW I’ve used before.
Harrison mixbus 2 how to#
I found myself spending much more time trying to figure out how to accomplish things like simple edits, instead of actually getting any real work done. Given all that, attempting to perform Mixbus operations that should be totally intuitive in a DAW often turned into an exercise in total aggravation. I was better off using Google to discover what I’d guess you’d call its “secrets”, the majority of the time. That allows me to read about exactly what I’m interested in, completely described in writing, and instantly.
Harrison mixbus 2 pdf#
As far as PDF User Guides go, I want to be able to look up what I need in an organized, detailed manual with a TOC and/or index, hyperlinked to the appropriate document sections. It’s so time consuming having to fast forward and rewind videos just to learn how to accomplish simple DAW functions. Really no big deal there as far as the connectivity is concerned, but that’s not the point I’m trying to make about using this method of writing manuals. But, how to use these functions? To really get in-depth on any given subject, you’re forced to watch on-line videos that are embedded within the manual, and that of course that requires an active Internet connection. It often just outlines items like which options are under which toolbar menu, like I can’t see that in the first place by simply clicking on them. The Mixbus User’s Guide is truly a woefully inadequate document. Typical guides easily run into hundreds upon hundreds of pages long, so beginning to use a new one is a very large investment in time and effort, not to mention money.
Harrison mixbus 2 software#
– For openers, and this is of course extremely important to new users, the Mixbus User’s Guide is absolute garbage:Ī DAW is an extremely complicated piece of software in learning to use properly. Now, with about 6 weeks of experience using Mixbus under my belt, here are just a few of the (major) shortcomings I’ve encountered: It’s a total powerhouse, and boots in literally about 10 seconds. – Mackie CR5 studio monitors (Marantz and CAD cans for close-up editing work) – On-board integrated Surround Sound (disabled of course, while mixing) – Dual Dell UltraSharp 24″ InfinityEdge Monitors, attached to an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 graphics card Let’s set this up with some specs on my DAW PC, just so no one thinks there’s a problem there: I’ve certainly got my reasons, many of which I’ve documented below. I must apologize if I’ve led anyone astray in wasting their time with this DAW.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d336/2d33663419015f96bbc197fe103275da68799fff" alt="harrison mixbus 2 harrison mixbus 2"
Now, after quite of bit of experience with it, I suggest you avoid Mixbus like the plague. The main reason I bring all of this up is, I had previously posted that I was initially pretty impressed with Mixbus. I’ve come to the conclusion that I’d rather eat a broken glass sandwich than continue on with it. Well, that was certainly premature, and the very opposite is true now. I posted a short while back about the demise of SONAR Cakewalk, and my switch to the Harrison Mixbus DAW, saying:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d11/f5d119f826bdbc99965ead5a71d5432c3946e8fa" alt="Harrison mixbus 2"